On the use of fan names
Jan. 13th, 2010 11:51 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Everyone in fandom has a fan name. It is the name that most people in fandom use for a particular person’s body of fannish work, be it art, fiction, vids, archives, opinion, twitter feed, or LJ. It can be anything: it may be derived from a favorite fandom, the title of a book, or the closest object when creating a new account. Whatever it is, that fan name is important; it is how we know and identify each other in fandom. The fan name is casually used, and has the individual’s history behind it. Even when someone chooses to use a new fan name, somewhere along the way a translation is made, so that the old history gets associated with the new name.
Occasionally, a fan will choose to use their legal name as their fan name. Conventional wisdom says not to do it, but the use of legal names as fan names is something that goes in and out of fannish fashion. In the early 90s, there was a big push to use legal names as there is nothing inherently nasty or wrong about participating in fandom, but as the community moved on line, the concerns about negative exposure meant that more people chose to use fan names disassociated with their legal (or ‘real life’) names.
So while it does feel weird and awkward, if a fan has chosen to use their real life name as a fan name, it is not an outing situation when another fan uses it as well. The individual using their RL name as a fan name may choose to rethink that choice and migrate to a new fan name, but that’s no different than any fan who decides that their old fan name no longer cuts it. It’s tough, but eventually--usually-- the change is accepted. People with wank-filled histories may find it harder to change their fan names, or a translation matrix may always follow behind them.
Occasionally, a fan will choose to use their legal name as their fan name. Conventional wisdom says not to do it, but the use of legal names as fan names is something that goes in and out of fannish fashion. In the early 90s, there was a big push to use legal names as there is nothing inherently nasty or wrong about participating in fandom, but as the community moved on line, the concerns about negative exposure meant that more people chose to use fan names disassociated with their legal (or ‘real life’) names.
So while it does feel weird and awkward, if a fan has chosen to use their real life name as a fan name, it is not an outing situation when another fan uses it as well. The individual using their RL name as a fan name may choose to rethink that choice and migrate to a new fan name, but that’s no different than any fan who decides that their old fan name no longer cuts it. It’s tough, but eventually--usually-- the change is accepted. People with wank-filled histories may find it harder to change their fan names, or a translation matrix may always follow behind them.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-13 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-13 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-13 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-13 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-13 09:28 pm (UTC)It occurs to me that this fits in with a larger conversation about persistent pseudonymity on the internet. We're not the only community where it's common for folks to write under pseudonyms. Other geek communities, kink communities, democracy activists in places where their work is dangerous, women who choose gender-neutral pseuds so they won't be talked-down to or hit-on -- the internet is full of people using pseuds, either because it's cultural custom or because we want to protect ourselves from one thing or another.
To my mind, what matters is that our pseudonymity is persistent. I'm Kass; I've been Kass in online media fandom for more than ten years. (On lj I'm kassrachel because I couldn't get "kass" by itself, but I publish fic as Kass, I used to post to mailing lists as Kass, I hang out in irc as Kass; it's the name everyone knows me by.) It is as much "my name" as is [firstname lastname], at least in this sphere.
I know I've heard Shoshanna talk about how she knows us by our fan names and not our legal names, and for that reason, the fan names are our "real names" for her. It matters that she knows who we are in the matrix of connection and community which is fandom; it doesn't matter so much if she knows what's on our driver's licenses. I totally agree. :-)
no subject
Date: 2010-01-13 11:47 pm (UTC)I think that's a part of why I want to stop using the term pseudonym in these type of discussions, because fan names aren't pseudonyms within Fandom. They represent a persons primary fannish identity, while the fan term sockpuppet is more aligned with the connotation of pseudonym in 'real name' discussions.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-13 09:35 pm (UTC)Yes, the "real names are the only names that count" argument seems a little silly to me, considering the weight of tradition against it. Or are the people making that argument going to discredit the work of Mark Twain, George Sand, Lewis Carroll, Ellery Queen, etc. because they published under pseudonyms?
As usual, I'm of two minds about this...
Date: 2010-01-14 01:31 am (UTC)The rest of the congregation were, well, us -- not sockpuppets by any means, using names we've used for a decade or more (on average), names with history and some level of shit-I-wouldn't-easily-give-this-name-up...sure -- but few if any of us were taking life/workplace risks in the conversation.
And the one person who did make an effort to bring a Real Name(tm) into the conversation was excoriated.
So, Teresa Nielson Hayden, for example, might lose free-lance editing jobs because an author or two no longer wants to work with her because of things she's said.** Most of us, on the other hand, had smaller risks. Lost of people on our flist; possible loss of actual friends...
Hmm, having said all that, I guess I think that there are three levels: real names, persistent (to use Kass's word) but not real names -- ones with accessible history, and people who change their names with their fandoms, or even faster.
**This is a for example -- I haven't read any where that authors are less willing to work with her, or other editors that were involved, since Race Fail.
Re: As usual, I'm of two minds about this...
Date: 2010-01-15 03:22 am (UTC)Yes!
Date: 2010-01-16 03:15 am (UTC)Complete change of subject
Date: 2010-01-16 03:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 12:16 am (UTC)I disagree. I'm not going to shout to the high hills OMG I'VE BEEN OUTED if someone slips and uses my IRL name where I'd like them not to, but it's common courtesy to call someone how they'd like to be called, and I don't think I'm being out of line when I ask them to chop off the last three letters of my last name. I do think it's my responsibility to establish the line, since it's not always obvious (I use my full legal name on non-searchable email lists and in private communication).
- Helen
no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 12:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 12:58 am (UTC)I think what I'm running into is, I don't have a single fannish identity. I sign my fanfic "Helen W.", but I've only been writing fanfic since 2002, whereas I've been doing fannish things for decades longer, using my RL name most of the time. And every now and then I ask someone to rephrase something online so as to not tie my RL name to my fanfic (to my fannishness is fine). And usually they do.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 01:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 02:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 11:12 pm (UTC)I find this post really interesting, but there's one thing I'd like to respectfully dispute.
Even when someone chooses to use a new fan name, somewhere along the way a translation is made, so that the old history gets associated with the new name.
I first participated in online fandom about...six or seven years ago? Over that period of time, I've had about five or so different 'identities' (there may have been more that I don't remember.) For me, the whole point of adopting a new fan name is to dissociate oneself from the works and/or wanks of a previous one. When I first joined fandom, I wrote ridiculous ppurple prose script fics, constantly made inane pop-culture references and obsessively fangirled over whatever character had taken my fancy that week. For me, adopting a new fan name is a part of the fannish evolutionary process, a way of saying "None of these ideas/attitudes/fandoms really apply to me any more." Then again, maybe I'm just weird.
Anyway, sorry for the teal deer.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 05:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 07:09 pm (UTC)Doesn't it, though? Feel weird and awkward, I mean. When someone uses [what appears to be] their full real life name as their fannish alias, I find myself hesitating each time I'm about to type it, feeling like I'm posting their home address, or linking to a photo of them naked. It doesn't help the awkwardness that I also feel compelled to use the full name. In offline discussion one usually abbreviates personal names to just the first or last name, but online, there's no guarantee that either of the names alone signifies that person (e.g., you could have a person going by 'John Meyer', but also have a person going by 'Meyer', or someone whose real name is Elizabeth something but who goes by 'Jane King' because they're fans of G.I. Jane and MLK Jr.).
(It's possible I think about names far too much.)
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 05:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 11:12 pm (UTC)I have encountered fans who take their knowledge of a popular fan's "real name" and wave it around like it makes them special . . . silly, that.
My only problem with fan writers using multiple pseuds (and this is something that predates the Internet) is how it complicates following (or avoiding) their work.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-22 03:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-13 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-13 09:18 pm (UTC)That said, you can take your RL name and change a spelling on it, add a middle name, or make yourself a nickname. Those seem to be accepted more easily than trying for a completely alternate name, unconnected to what you have been using. Laura47 is nicely generic, and maybe you want to move over to just using that.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-13 09:47 pm (UTC)mostly my concern is if i start writing fic or making vids with "adult" content... i'm working in education, but on the textbook side, and i am more and more convinced i won't ever go back to directly teaching children... but what if i want to? I'm just so *comfortable* in this name... i even have an alternate livejournal for talking about explicit things I don't want associated with my real name (it was a fad with my RL friends), I could move fannish stuff there... All of this has been bouncing around in my head for months now... hence all the ...
no subject
Date: 2010-01-13 11:31 pm (UTC)My sense of the textbook industry - especially anything k-12 - is that it is more politicized than schools themselves and more vulnerable to criticism from ultra-conservative crazy people.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 02:34 am (UTC)Too tired to think thinky thoughts about this now. :-)
no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 12:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 02:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 02:08 am (UTC)I have a much harder time when fans whom I have come to also know by their legal name use a fan name that sounds like a conventional IRL name, but is not theirs. For I am old and nearing senility, and cannot always remember which is which on the spot, and fear an accidental slip of the worst kind.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 05:07 am (UTC)