![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
At that point, all the energy went out of us. If you didn't have a strong background in the character and his history, you couldn't get the vid. It was a confusion of images and sounds that just didn't make sense. The vid seemed to work fine for those who knew Duncan's history and his character, but as that was only about a third of the Highlander slashers at the time, it was a little disheartening. It meant that the audience for the vid would never be that big, as it required too much detailed knowledge of characters and canon to be truly accessible.
So, when Melina made a statement about how
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
And that seemed to be about the level of most of the Escapade audience: a passing familiarity with a lot of fandoms, but wide-spread, detailed knowledge of only a few. Graduate level vids are gonna be a hard sell in that environment, for more than a handful of fans with the specialized education required, and if there's a mismatch between what a first grade/literal interpretation of a scene would be in comparison to a graduate level/metaphorical interpretation -- well, the audience is likely to react to it en masse at grade level one. I think that graduate level vids can and should be shown at cons, but if you want to prevent misunderstood viewings, they should be reviewed by a fan who is somewhat unfamiliar with the fandom prior to the showing to make sure that there's no grade one level joke or perception that would interfere with the more "educated" reading.
An example of this: we used the occasional shot of fire or heat vision on some of our lyric lines, so the grade one read has the audience going "Oh! Fire. Hot. I get it." If you're saying anything more complicated along with that, it may be completely missed. The literal interpretation is the grade one interpretation, and if there is nothing else that the grade one reader can tie into, then they will spend the whole vid reacting to that.
For us, it worked great. For someone else trying to say something complex about the fandom or the relationship or character, it might not.
So beware the cheese.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-01 11:18 pm (UTC)While true, this is not what I meant. I am not an HL *fan* is a more useful statement.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-01 11:54 pm (UTC)So maybe the theory needs expansion to include the idea that even if you don't watch the source of a particular fandom, watching a lot of vids in it over a period of years can itself increase your reading level in the fandom. Which is kind of interesting...
no subject
Date: 2005-03-02 08:22 pm (UTC)Which reminds me I need to go look at your new ones!
no subject
Date: 2005-03-05 10:07 pm (UTC)That *is* interesting, and certainly true in my case although I'd never thought about it in those terms before.
I think the "reading levels" concept in general is a *great* addition to vidding vocabulary -- and it'll be an especially useful term at VividCon, I think.