wickedwords: (vid tv by sherrold)
[personal profile] wickedwords
[livejournal.com profile] melina123 is the person who originally brought this up, and it made sense to me, so I'm gonna put out a half-baked version of the concept so it can be discussed and refined a bit. Several years ago, the Highlander Media Cannibals created a vid to "Hear that Voice Again." It was a pretty complicated vid, attempting to show how guilt and Duncan's past history and insecurities have fucked up his life. The first person we showed it to, who was a Methos fan without any real interest in Duncan, was very confused by it. "What is this, a graduate exam?"

At that point, all the energy went out of us. If you didn't have a strong background in the character and his history, you couldn't get the vid. It was a confusion of images and sounds that just didn't make sense. The vid seemed to work fine for those who knew Duncan's history and his character, but as that was only about a third of the Highlander slashers at the time, it was a little disheartening. It meant that the audience for the vid would never be that big, as it required too much detailed knowledge of characters and canon to be truly accessible.

So, when Melina made a statement about how [livejournal.com profile] sherrold's and my Smallville vid "So Damn Hot" was at her 'reading level' in the fandom, it made a ton of sense to me. You don't have to know a lot about the fandom to access the vid, but you have to know some to get the biggest joke.

And that seemed to be about the level of most of the Escapade audience: a passing familiarity with a lot of fandoms, but wide-spread, detailed knowledge of only a few. Graduate level vids are gonna be a hard sell in that environment, for more than a handful of fans with the specialized education required, and if there's a mismatch between what a first grade/literal interpretation of a scene would be in comparison to a graduate level/metaphorical interpretation -- well, the audience is likely to react to it en masse at grade level one. I think that graduate level vids can and should be shown at cons, but if you want to prevent misunderstood viewings, they should be reviewed by a fan who is somewhat unfamiliar with the fandom prior to the showing to make sure that there's no grade one level joke or perception that would interfere with the more "educated" reading.

An example of this: we used the occasional shot of fire or heat vision on some of our lyric lines, so the grade one read has the audience going "Oh! Fire. Hot. I get it." If you're saying anything more complicated along with that, it may be completely missed. The literal interpretation is the grade one interpretation, and if there is nothing else that the grade one reader can tie into, then they will spend the whole vid reacting to that.

For us, it worked great. For someone else trying to say something complex about the fandom or the relationship or character, it might not.

So beware the cheese.

Date: 2005-03-01 11:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tzikeh.livejournal.com
but I'm not a HL vid,

While true, this is not what I meant. I am not an HL *fan* is a more useful statement.

Date: 2005-03-01 11:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] melinafandom.livejournal.com
You probably understand the relationship well enough, though -- even if that understanding comes from other vids rather than the show itself -- for Say to be meaningful. Maybe that's true for other sophisticated vid-watchers, too, so it probably isn't a very good example at all :)

So maybe the theory needs expansion to include the idea that even if you don't watch the source of a particular fandom, watching a lot of vids in it over a period of years can itself increase your reading level in the fandom. Which is kind of interesting...

Date: 2005-03-02 08:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laurashapiro.livejournal.com
*nod* I think that's definitely the case. I wouldn't know who those guys even are without vids. Now I feel like I know them, and I understand their relationship, and it's pretty much all from vid-watching. Especially watching *your* vids.

Which reminds me I need to go look at your new ones!

Date: 2005-03-05 10:07 pm (UTC)
heresluck: (Default)
From: [personal profile] heresluck
...even if you don't watch the source of a particular fandom, watching a lot of vids in it over a period of years can itself increase your reading level in the fandom.

That *is* interesting, and certainly true in my case although I'd never thought about it in those terms before.

I think the "reading levels" concept in general is a *great* addition to vidding vocabulary -- and it'll be an especially useful term at VividCon, I think.

Profile

wickedwords: (Default)
wickedwords

October 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516171819 2021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 03:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios